Miguel Herrera complains about the refereeing in the defeat to America

The coach pointed out that if VAR is not used, it is a tool that does not help the referees, and they did not score a penalty kick for Xolos.

The technician Tijuana, Miguel HerreraHe was not happy with the defeat his team suffered with a score of 0-2 America He attacked the arbitration and Video Assistant RefereeConsidering that a penalty kick was not awarded to his team during the development of the match.

In a press conference, the Al-Hodood strategist was frank when he pointed out that “the team that played football better does not win,” and placed the blame on the arbitration panel. “Delete the 'maybe'. It doesn't define the play, but the play is clear. It's a very clear play. There's a very good tool and they say that Video Assistant Referee It doesn't work, of course it does. You just have to use it, and if you don't use it, it's useless. If it is not used, it is a useless tool. It's a clear and obvious scoring opportunity. “It's the clearest thing in football and they should celebrate it,” he initially said. Herrera.

He later added: “Unfortunately, that's the case, because they don't use the tool and then they get angry and say I'm speaking badly about the referee, but that's not the case. I say they don't use a tool that helps them. It's a play where you can see it and appreciate it. You see a kick when the ball is “One meter away and you have to mark it. If it is not used we will say it is not useful, but of course it is useful.”

In the same context, he pointed out that they were unlucky, as the visiting team made three shots on goal and achieved a double with Salvador Reyes.

“We kicked eight and didn't score. We didn't have a goal, and when we did, Malagon came out and became the goal. We should be upset, because the team deserved more and they found themselves in fluke games and ended up winning the game.”