New standards for Intel Core i9-13900K processor

In the absence of a little more than two months, most likely, it will be Lake Raptor launch eventThirteenth generation Intel Core. A little over two months later, they’re almost certain We’ll see the emergence of new performance tests Test units, which will help us get a more or less specific idea of ​​what the new generation will bring us. Jill, however, we are already learning many details, which indicate Big leap in performance.

And today we know the new performance tests, in this case of the future top-of-the-range, Intel Core i9-13900K, the processor of which, for the moment, we already know whatThe mail will have 24 centers (Eight performance and 16 efficiency) for a total of 32 threads, 36MB of L3 cache and 32MB of L2 cache for a total of 68MB and that their performance cores will start at 3GHz, to be able to expand up to 5.7 or 5.8 as per different sources.

These new performance tests are published by Extreme Player in Bilibiliwhere we can see the results Both synthetic tests and some gamesAs a weighted result of them, we can infer a performance increase of 5% between the Core i9-13900K and its predecessor, the Core i9-12900K. However, the optimization was accounted for by the performance cores giving a maximum of 5.5GHz, so we can understand that the final optimization will be even greater.

The synthetic test chosen was 3DMark, where we can see some minor differences, but also others that are more obvious, as you can see in this table:

And when it comes to games, the selection consists of Horizon-Zero Down, Red Dead Redemption 2, Far Cry 6, Forza Horizon 5, Monster Hunter: Rise, PUBG, Final Fantasy IX, and CS: GO. In this table, you can see their results, along with those from 3DMark:

An interesting comparison is the one provided by the power consumption figures, in which we see the Intel Core i9-13900K Can consume up to 52% more in games than the Core i9-12900K and averaged 20% more power consumption across all three resolutions tested. This means that the next generation of the Raptor Lake CPU line will consume more power than Alder Lake.

The average FPS breakdown at each resolution is as follows:

• Intel Core i9-13900K vs Core i9-12900K at 1080p: 4.22% faster performance on average.
• Intel Core i9-13900K vs. Core i9-12900K at 1440p: 6.97% faster performance on average.
• Intel Core i9-13900K vs. Core i9-12900K at 2160p: 3.30% faster performance on average.

For a minimum FPS, the breakdown at each resolution is as follows:

• Intel Core i9-13900K vs Core i9-12900K at 1080p: 27.93% faster than the minimum frames per second.
• Intel Core i9-13900K vs. Core i9-12900K at 1440p: 21.83% faster than the minimum frames per second.
• Intel Core i9-13900K vs. Core i9-12900K at 2160p: 12.82% faster than the minimum frames per second.

Finally, we have the maximum FPS rating for each resolution:

• Intel Core i9-13900K vs Core i9-12900K at 1080p : 6.29% faster max FPS.
• Intel Core i9-13900K vs. Core i9-12900K at 1440p: 4.42% maximum speed per second.
• Intel Core i9-13900K vs. Core i9-12900K at 2160p: 2.58% faster max FPS.

And so, as we see, remembering again that we are talking about the maximum performance of 5.5 GHz, which will probably reach 5.7 or 5.8, we are faced with a rather large jump, which can still increase further in the final version of the processor.