The Intel Arc A770 delivers performance similar to that of the RTX 3060 with Vulkan and OpenCL

Graphics Intel Arc A750 and Arc A770 processor They’re right around the corner, so it’s time to see what performance they’ll put in. Thanks to Benchleaks, it looks like the most powerful model will achieve its goal of being a direct competitor to GeForce RTX 3060Or at least that’s what the leaker’s compositional tests showed.

The leaker used Intel Arc A750 and Arc A770 graphics along with an Intel Core i9-12900KS processor and 32GB of DDR5-6400 RAM installed on the ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 APEX motherboard. wccfetch Taking the results obtained and comparing them with those of the RTX 3060 Ti, the standard RTX 3060, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, the RX 6600 XT, taking into account the results obtained using OpenCL and Vulkan APIs.

Compared with Vulcanmade with Geekbench 5, it can be seen that the . file The Intel Arc A770 stays close to the RTX 3060 with a score of 73,636, while the NVIDIA model has achieved 74485 at the time. For its part, the Arc A750 scored 66,609 points in the same test, surpassing, by not much, the RX 6600 XT, which scored 64,460 points.

in the test with OpenCLan API that is less used in home environments, the The Intel Arc A770 managed to slightly outperform the benchmark RTX 3060, scoring 99,482 points, compared to its competitor’s 96,416 points., so the blue giant histogram is about 3% more on this front. With the Arc 750, the scenario seen with the Vulkan is somewhat repeated, scoring 88,828 points compared to the 82,559 of the RX 6600 XT, making it 8% faster or lower.

In terms of reference prices, which can be different for the eurozone (and thus paint a completely different scenario), the RX 6700 XT costs $379 compared to $349 for the Intel Arc A770. The Intel Arc A750, on the other hand, is priced at $289 compared to the $299 for the RX 6650 XT. Here, regardless of the power-price ratio, aspects such as technological maturity should be taken into account, where Radeon, at least for the time being, is clearly ahead of Intel.

As we can see, Intel seems to have met, at least in part, expectations with a couple of benchmarks, but Things can change a lot when this is translated into a real scenario And not only for performance problems, but also for other types of failures.

Finally, it is important to know that the tests were done on Windows 11, something that Linux users should take into account because ANV, the Vulkan driver included with TableIt still needs to be improved a lot to be a worthy competitor RADV The official NVIDIA driver.