User level health

There is a fact that emergency patients in Basurto will lose out on time that could cost them their lives if they are referred to Cruces. And I say: And these are from Galdacao or Ardoleez? Should we dismantle – according to this logic – a service whose areas of research are so fundamental, according to the car itself, that its capabilities will be diminished?

Another thing that bothers me is the theory of lost skill and dexterity in the medical team. I don’t think the cardiac surgeons in Basurto will be cauterized anymore. In fact, applying the logic of the previous point, perhaps it should be distributed to other hospitals in Bizkaia so that their expertise is closer to their patients in emergency situations, with equal rights to the quality of public health.

I insist that I have no idea what the lower pejolera is, but I tremble from the depth of the debate over who stands as superintendent of the system claiming that the administration in charge of the service order justifies its decision.

Been completed. I find it very reasonable for a judge to be concerned that the economic impact of centralization of service is irreversible after the years of litigation he anticipates. Should we be less concerned with the economic or quality impact of not centralizing the same amount of time? Did you measure it? However, the logic is at the user level. I say. It wouldn’t be…