Science holds the key to knowing when you are being lied to

How do you know if someone is lying? Don’t focus on body language, but on the message of the story itself.

Much has been said about lies and their relationship to certain gestures or simply body language. It is said that if you look at a certain place while lying, then this is a clear sign that can give you. Something similar happens with too much gestures or, simply put, with the nervousness that appears from the body when telling a story with some invented nuances. Now, did you know that it is possible to spot a liar more easily? It is enough to pay attention to his story and pay attention to the details he tells.

It seems that if someone wants to get involved with the story and decides to provide an in-depth explanation, they are likely to be telling the truth. This is exactly what one might think after learning how a new study has proven this factor to be the most important factor for detecting that someone is lying. In general, when telling something that isn’t true, what you’re looking for is non-compliance at any point, so you’ll try to avoid giving too intense details about what happened in a particular room.

If it is found that you are missing this a bit and only providing superficial information, then most likely you are missing essential details. This is the conclusion reached by a new study recently conducted by Bruno Verschuere. We find ourselves before a much more interesting proposition than we had known before, for these propositions were so close to the manner of anyone’s existence, and to be able to distort the possibility that a lie was necessary when presenting an argument.

No, Pinocchio was not right, the key is not in the body, but in the letter

Pinocchio, when he lied, his nose grew. These details can be similar to any gesturing that is supposed to occur when telling a lie. On the other hand, this new study focuses specifically on the way a particular story is told. In this way, the goal is to establish what emphasis is placed on when telling the details and, of course, what are the keys to understanding that one is not afraid to tell the truth. The point of alert is focused on analyzing the data provided.

In order to come to this conclusion, two groups of people were formed. The crux of the matter was that the test questions were stolen, so basically the key was to explain what happened if they were accused of stealing. The group that committed the crime focused on saying that it did not lead to the commission of the crime, while those who did not do anything were more involved when it came to providing details of their interest.

From a comparison perspective, it was very obvious to know who was the person who caused the aforementioned theft. Providing a somewhat superficial explanation was key to finding the culprits, something that could be of great use on future occasions to discover who is telling the truth and who is not.